Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Factoids about the Kardashian Marriage from the Guardian newspaper

• How many months K & K knew each other before getting engaged: 6
• How many months they were engaged: 3
• How much Kim made from the wedding thanks to magazine deals, etc:$17.9m
• How much she therefore made per hour of the 72-day marrige, as calculated by New York Times' investigative journalist Don van Natta Jr:$10,358.80
• The current minimum wage in California: $8 an hour
• How many hours the E! special of their wedding lasted: 4
• How many months E! spent promoting the wedding, daily: 3
• How many months they were actually married: 2½
• Kim & K's wedding cost: $10m
• Donald Trump's last wedding: $1m
• Price tag on one vase on K & K's wedding list: $7,500
• How much the wedding cake cost: $6,000
• How many Vera Wang wedding dresses Kim had for the wedding: 3
• How much each wedding dress cost: $20,000
• How much her mother Kris spent on a face lift for the wedding: $50,000

Divorce

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

ONION: Study Finds Every Style Of Parenting Produces Disturbed, Miserable Adults

Article from the satirical Onion:
SANTA ROSA, CA—A study released by the California Parenting Institute Tuesday shows that every style of parenting inevitably causes children to grow into profoundly unhappy adults. "Our research suggests that while overprotective parenting ultimately produces adults unprepared to contend with life's difficulties, highly permissive parenting leads to feelings of bitterness and isolation throughout adulthood," lead researcher Daniel Porter said. "And, interestingly, we found that anything between those two extremes is equally damaging, always resulting in an adult who suffers from some debilitating combination of unpreparedness and isolation. Despite great variance in parenting styles across populations, the end product is always the same: a profoundly flawed and joyless human being." The study did find, however, that adults often achieve temporary happiness when they have children of their own to perpetuate the cycle of human misery

Monday, October 17, 2011

The Los Angeles Times reports on a whistle-blower who tells how a private detective arranged for men to be arrested for drunk driving at the behest of their ex-wives and their lawyers — and that entrapment using decoys was only one of many alleged misdeeds. Read full article


David Dutcher says his 2008 arrest on suspicion of drunk driving was a setup orchestrated by a private detective who is the subject of a state and federal criminal investigation. (Michael Macor, The Chronicle / October 17, 2011)


Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Los Angeles Times - MCourt Divorce

Frank and Jamie McCourt confirmed in a joint statement Monday that they have settled their divorce, as The Times reported earlier in the day. The McCourts disclosed no terms other than that Jamie McCourt would withdraw her Bankruptcy Court opposition to the Dodgers' proposed sale of television rights and would now support that sale. Major League Baseball and Fox Sports remain opposed. Read article

Are community property laws taken into account in determining adjusted gross income (or modified adjusted gross income) for purposes of the dependent


According to a recent IRS publication:Yes. Community property laws must be taken into account in determining the adjusted gross income (or modified adjusted gross income) amounts in section 21(a) (dependent care credit), section 24(b) (child tax credit), section 32(a) (earned income credit), and section 36A(b) (making work pay credit).

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Saturday, October 08, 2011

Are registered domestic partners who reported income without regard to community property laws required to amend their pre-2010 returns to each report


According to a recent IRS publication:Registered domestic partners who reported community income without regard to community property laws for a taxable year beginning before 2010 are generally not required to amend those returns to report half of the community income. The following rules apply for taxable years prior to 2010:

Registered domestic partners in California received full community property rights in 2007. Thus, in California, registered domestic partners may, but are not required to, amend their returns for taxable years beginning in 2007, 2008, and 2009 to report half of the community income of the partners.

In Nevada, the state’s community property laws apply to registered domestic partners as of October 1, 2009. Thus, registered domestic partners may, but are not required to, amend their returns for a taxable year beginning in 2009 to report half of the community income of the partners for the period beginning October 1, 2009 and ending on the last day of the partner’s 2009 taxable year.

In Washington, the state’s community property laws apply to registered domestic partners as of June 12, 2008. Thus, registered domestic partners may, but are not required to, amend their returns for a taxable year beginning in 2009 to report half of the community income of the partners. For 2008, the partners may, but are not required to, amend their returns to report half of the community income of the partners for the period beginning June 12, 2008 and ending on the last day of the partner’s 2008 taxable year.

In all cases, if one of the partners amends his or her return to report half of the community income, the other partner must report the other half.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

If a registered domestic partner adopts the child of his or her partner as a second parent or co-parent, may the adopting parent claim the adoption cr


According to a recent IRS publication:The adopting parent may claim an adoption credit to the extent provided under § 36C. Section 36C(d)(1)(C) does not allow taxpayers to claim an adoption credit for expenses incurred in adopting the child of the taxpayer’s spouse. However, the limitation in section 36C(d)(1)(C) does not apply to adoptions by registered domestic partners because registered domestic partners are not spouses as defined by federal law.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

If two registered domestic partners adopt a child together, can one or both of the partners qualify for the adoption credit?


According to a recent IRS publication:Each registered domestic partner may qualify to claim the adoption credit on the amount of the qualified adoption expenses paid or incurred for the adoption. The partners may not both claim credit for the same qualified adoption expenses, and neither partner may claim more than the amount of expenses that he or she paid or incurred. The adoption credit is limited to $13,170 per child in 2010. Thus, if two registered domestic partners each paid qualified adoption expenses to adopt the same child, and the total of those expenses exceeds $13,170, the maximum credit available for the adoption is $13,170. The partners may allocate this maximum between them in any way they agree, but the amount allocated to a partner may not be more than the amount of expenses he or she paid or incurred. The same rules generally apply in the case of a special needs adoption. The total credit for such an adoption is limited to $13,170, but the amount that each partner may claim is not limited by the amount of expenses paid or incurred.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Thursday, October 06, 2011

Are community property laws taken into account in determining earned income for purposes of the dependent care credit, the refundable portion of the c


According to a recent IRS publication:No. The federal tax laws governing these credits specifically provide that earned income is computed without regard to community property laws in determining the earned income amounts described in section 21(d) (dependent care credit), section 24(d) (the refundable portion of the child tax credit), section 32(a) (earned income credit), and section 36A(d) (making work pay credit).

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Are registered domestic partners each entitled to take credit for half of the total estimated tax payments paid by the partners?


According to a recent IRS publication: No. Unlike withholding credits, which are allowed to the person who is taxed on the income from which the tax is withheld, a registered domestic partner can take credit only for the estimated tax payments that he or she made.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

Are registered domestic partners each entitled to half of the credits for income tax withholding from the combined wages of the registered domestic pa


According to a recent IRS publication: Yes. Because each registered domestic partner is taxed on half the combined community income earned by the partners, each is entitled to a credit for half of the income tax withheld on the combined wages.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Money and Divorce

It can be hard to deal with divorce from an entirely rational viewpoint, but letting your emotions get the better of you can hurt your wallet more than your pride.

Your best option is to be as honest as possible – don’t try to hide your assets – no matter how badly you’d hate to share them with your ex – as this will only take more time and money to sort out and is TOTALLY ILLEGAL.

Failing to agree over the division of family assets (such as the family home, a business and pension funds), child custody and support and even personal items like CD collections or pets can also cause fees to skyrocket, especially if both parties reach a stalemate over who gets to keep Harry the hamster

How to negotiate:

Collaborative law is growing in popularity. Rather than attorneys exchanging a series of angry (and expensive) letters as they negotiate the terms of the settlement and ending up in court if they can't agree, instead both parties sit down with their respective attorneys to, if possible, work out the terms of the settlement. This only works if both sides are prepared to be constructive and, again, make full-disclosure of their assets. It is an “all cards on the table” exercise but, if successful, can reduce the legal costs of divorce considerably.

Collaborative law is not dissimilar to mediation, although this has proven unpopular with couples as there is usually only one mediator involved who can give advice to both parties, meaning one often feels short-changed at the end of the process.

In collaborative law, your attorney is present during the meetings and if a settlement can’t be reached, the same attorney can’t go on to represent you in court, thus eliminating any incentive to draw out the process in hope of a larger fee.

Protect your assets:

If you are experiencing an emotional or bitter divorce then make sure, if you do choose to get married again, that you’re prepared for the worst. A prenup, is a worthwhile consideration particularly where one party is bringing significant assets into the marriage. It is intended that the prenup would provide the couple with a framework for dividing the assets on a divorce. (read more on pre-nups) Finally, no matter how betrayed you feel, or how bitter the divorce, it is almost always best to grin and bear the pain even after the proceedings are over rather than harbour a grudge into eternity.

The benefit of couples dealing with matters amicably is that this will hopefully enable them to communicate sensibly with their former spouse in the future. Many divorcing couples seem to forget that, following the resolution of the proceedings between them, that they may still need to have contact with their former spouse, particularly where children are involved. (read more on child custody) Generally where the couple have conducted the proceedings amicably, there seems to be a better prospect of them avoiding further disputes with their former spouse. (read more on hidden assets)

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Tuesday, October 04, 2011

How should registered domestic partners report Schedule C income that is community property?


According to a recent IRS publication: Half of the income, deductions, and net earnings of a business operated by a registered domestic partner must be reported by each registered domestic partner on a Schedule C (or Schedule C-EZ). In addition, each registered domestic partner owes self-employment tax on half of the net earnings of the business. Although the employment tax rules prohibit spouses from treating net earnings as community income (section 1402(a)(5)), registered domestic partners are not spouses as defined by federal law and this provision does not apply to them.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Retirement Plans FAQs

1. Types Of Retirement Plans

2. Earning Retirement Benefits

3. Plan Information To Review

4. Payment Of Benefits

5. Taking Your Retirement Benefit With You

6. Your Benefit During A Plan Termination Or Company Merger

7. Divorce - Potential Claims Against Your Benefit

In general, your retirement plan is safe from claims by other people. Creditors to whom you owe money cannot make a claim against funds that you have in a retirement plan. For example, if you leave your employer and transfer your 401(k) account into an individual retirement account (IRA), creditors generally cannot get access to those IRA funds even if you declare bankruptcy.Federal law does make an exception for family support and the division of property at divorce. A state court can award part or all of a participant's retirement benefit to the spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent. The recipient named in the order is called the alternate payee. The court issues a specific court order, called a domestic relations order, which can be in the form of a state court judgment, decree or order, or court approval of a property settlement agreement. The order must relate to child support, alimony, or marital property rights, and must be made under state domestic relations law. The plan administrator determines if the order is a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) under the plan's procedures and then notifies the participant and the alternate payee. If the participant is still employed, a QDRO can require payment to the alternate payee to begin on or after the participant's earliest possible retirement age available under the plan. These rules apply to both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. (see QDROs)

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Monday, October 03, 2011

Is a registered domestic partner the stepparent of his or her partner’s child?

According to an IRS publication: If a registered domestic partner is the stepparent of his or her partner’s child under the laws of the state in which the partners reside, then the registered domestic partner is the stepparent of the child for federal income tax purposes.

Divorce and hard times

Gregory Rodriguez, July 13, 2009 Los Angeles Times

Economic woes often cause marital splits, right? Well, not so fast.
Can't stand your boring husband? Thinking of calling it quits? Well, you should have mustered the nerve to leave him well before this economic crisis. Now you might not be able to afford to live without him, literally.

It's a well-known fact that financial woes are the biggest cause of marital spats. With the economy the way it is, you'd expect lots of husbands and wives to be at each other's throats. But the conventional wisdom is wrong. This recession is so bad that you can count divorce lawyers among those professions that have taken a hit.

That's good news, right? People are now forced to stay together and work things out. Well, not if history tells us anything. The Depression also saw a decline in the divorce rate, but, according to marriage historian Stephanie Coontz, incidents of domestic violence and outright family desertion went up.

In any case, despite the fact that divorce can cause all sorts of emotional and financial turmoil, its statistical decline isn't as positive a social indicator as one might think. As economist David Friedman has written, divorce is actually a reflection of "an increase in the range of choice available to individuals," and a high divorce rate and the general weakening of marriage "are bad things only to the extent that they reflect a failure of our institutions and expectations to adjust completely to new circumstances."

In other words, in more traditional days, in which social changes occurred more slowly, we all shared a general idea as to what marriage was and how it functioned. From an economic standpoint, we all understood how the marital division of labor worked. But in a rapidly changing society, it's harder to figure out what kind of arrangement we should make with our spouses. Such changes as the entrance of large numbers of women into the workplace and the mechanization or outsourcing of household duties (from washing clothes to curing bacon) undermined that tradition.

As the basic marriage deal has shifted, our notions and ideals haven't shifted with it, and the disconnect explains the astronomical divorce rate in contemporary America. We haven't figured out a new marriage model that takes into account the greater range of choices for both women and men.

This fits right into the fact that we're divorcing less in hard times. In the context of this recession, we have fewer choices, and fewer choices means we're back to a good fit with the marriage model of old. Still -- and a little paradoxically -- the fact that there are untraditional marriages may also be helping husbands and wives withstand some of the emotional and financial stress of economic hard times. During the Depression, the ego blow to a man who lost his job caused marital problems. Today, if a man loses his job -- and his wife is the breadwinner -- it's less likely to create as much unhappiness.

If it's distasteful to you to look at marriage in economic terms, then it might be easier to consider the economics of divorce. Not only are there attorney's fees to be paid, but the value of the two biggest assets of most marriages -- a home and a retirement plan -- has diminished dramatically. Faced with the prospect of halving their shrunken assets, many couples are deciding to stick it out a while.

A recent survey conducted by the Institute of Divorce Financial Analysts -- who knew? -- found that 68% of its members "have seen clients who could not afford to get divorced because of recession-related financial problems."

So even as most of us are looking forward to happier days of an economic recovery, there must be a number of Americans who are waiting patiently to be able to afford to experience the pain and suffering of divorce. You've heard of the pent-up desire and aspiration that are released after times of war? That's why we get such phenomena as baby booms. When this economic recovery finally arrives, prepare yourselves for a boom of an entirely different sort.

Write to George Rodriguez: grodriguez@latimescolumnists.com
Read the whole article here

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Sunday, October 02, 2011

If a child is a qualifying child under section 152(c) of both parents who are registered domestic partners, which parent may claim the child as a depe

According to an IRS: If a child is a qualifying child under section 152(c) of both parents who are registered domestic partners, either parent, but not both, may claim a dependency deduction for the qualifying child. If both parents claim a dependency deduction for the child on their income tax returns, the IRS will treat the child as the qualifying child of the parent with whom the child resides for the longer period of time. If the child resides with each parent for the same amount of time during the taxable year, the IRS will treat the child as the qualifying child of the parent with the higher adjusted gross income.

Family Home in Divorce Part IV

By Warren R. Shiell

The following information is specific to California.

How do we determine the value of the house?

If you decide to either to buy out the other spouse’s community interest in the house or to exchange it for another asset, you will need to know the equity and financial value of the house. The equity in the house is equal to the house’s fair market value less any debts connected to the house such as mortgages and liens. The fair market value of the house is usually assessed by a certified real estate appraiser. The parties may agree to jointly retain an appraiser to keep down costs. A certified appraiser who knows the local market may provide a more accurate appraisal than the local realtor. Sometimes couples place the house on the market to see of anyone makes any offers.

It is important to note that if the Court is asked to calculate each spouse’s share in the house it will only consider the equity value. The court will not consider other costs that might reduce future sale proceeds such as closing costs, sales commissions and tax bills because those costs are not considered “immediate and specific.” FN5. Therefore, if the fair market value of the house is $500,000 and the balance of all outstanding mortgages is $200,000, the equity value of the house is $300,000. If this is all community interest then each spouse will be entitled to $150,000.

If you are trying to negotiate a settlement, you may wish to argue that the financial value of the house should be considered after taking into account taxes after sale and closing costs. This is important because once you get divorced and awarded the house you are only entitled to a $250,000 exemption on any gain. Therefore what may look like a fair bargain may not seem so fair after you factor in taxes. Consider this example: the equity value of the family home is $500,000 and the equity value of stocks and shares is also $500,000. Is this a fair exchange if the husband keeps the stocks and shares in exchange for the house? It depends. Assume that the shares have a high tax basis so that if they are sold the husband is liable for $100,000 of gain. The wife on the other hand is liable for $250,000 gain if she ever decides to sell the house. Is this still a fair exchange?

(read more on our website)

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Saturday, October 01, 2011

Can a registered domestic partner qualify to file his or her tax return using head-of-household filing status?


According to recent IRS publication: Generally, to qualify as a head-of-household, a taxpayer must provide more than half the cost of maintaining his or her household during the taxable year, and that household must be the principal place of abode of the taxpayer’s dependent for more than half of the taxable year. If registered domestic partners pay all of the costs of maintaining the household from community funds, each partner is considered to have incurred half the cost and neither can qualify as head of household. However, if one of the partners pays more than half by contributing separate funds, that partner may qualify as head-of-household.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Family Home in Divorce Part III

By Warren R. Shiell

The following information is specific to California.

What are the options for dividing the house?

There are three options if you are trying to reach a settlement:

(a) One spouse buys out the community interest share of the other spouse;
(b) The house is sold and the proceeds are divided; and
(c) The house remains in joint names for a limited period of time and is then sold to the other spouse or is put on the market.

During economic downturns when house prices are depressed couples increasingly turn to the last option.

But there is a catch. If you litigate, option (c) is called a deferred sale order (or a “Duke Order”) and the Court can only order a deferred sale in very limited circumstances where it is in lieu of child support and economically feasible. FN3.

Should I keep the house or exchange it for other assets?

It is very important to consider the financial as well as the legal realities of electing to keep the house. It is used to be very common where the husband owns a business to suggest that the wife keeps the house and the husband keeps the business. Before even getting into whether this is a fair exchange of assets of equal value, one has to consider whether the spouse who wants to keep the house can afford to do so. Often the spouse who has primary custody of children wants to stay in the house for the sake of the children but this may not be economically possible. The spouse who wants to stay in the home should sit down and work out a budget. They should estimate housing costs and compare this with their estimate earnings from employment, support and other sources. Housing costs are more than just mortgage and property taxes and one should factor in utilities, repairs, insurance, fees etc. You may also be entitled to mortgage interest deduction relief lowering your costs. If you can still afford to stay in the house, only then should you consider this option.

(read more on our website)

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Friday, September 30, 2011

QDROs - Division of Pensions FAQs

1. What is a Qualified Domestic Relations Order?

2. What is a Domestic Relations Order?

3. Must a Domestic Relations Order be issued by a state court?

4. Who can be an Alternate Payee?

5. What information must a domestic relations order contain to qualify as a QDRO under ERISA?

6. Are there other requirements that a domestic relations order must meet to be a QDRO?

7. May a QDRO be part of the divorce decree or property settlement?

8. Must a domestic relations order be issued as part of a divorce proceeding to be a QDRO?

9. Will a domestic relations order fail to be a QDRO solely because of the timing of issuance?

10. May a QDRO provide for payment to the guardian of an alternate payee?

11. Can a QDRO cover more than one plan?

12. Must all QDROs have the same provisions?

13. Who determines whether an order is a QDRO?

14. Who is the administrator of the plan?

For more on Retirement Plans

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Divorce May Make You Sick

NEW YORK, July 28, 2009 CBS News

Study Finds Divorced and Widowed Adults Have 20 Percent More Chronic Conditions than Married People

Psychologist Jeff Gardere spoke to Julie Chen about the damaging mental stress that may result from divorce.

(CBS) Can divorce make you sick?

Yes, according to a new study that finds divorce and widowhood have a lingering, detrimental impact on health -- even after remarriage.

The study, scheduled to be published in the September issue of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior, analyzes data from nearly 9,000 adults nationwide, ages 51 to 61, and finds those who had been divorced or widowed suffered 20 percent more chronic health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes or cancer, than individuals who were currently married.

Dr. Catherine Birndorf, associate professor of psychiatry at New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center told CBS News, "With a divorce or with disruption in a family like that,(it) can lead to depression, anxiety, other kinds of psychological illnesses."

Researchers have known for years that marriage is good for your health, but they've been less clear on how you'll do if you lose your spouse to divorce or death.

The study also suggests that divorce can be so traumatic that not even tying the knot again is enough to reverse the physical and mental toll.

So does this mean spouses should stick together even when the going gets really tough?

Birndorf said, "If someone's in a bad marriage, I would want to try and help them figure out how to make it better. But I wouldn't rule out the idea that it may need to end in divorce versus staying together for the sake of health."

In fact, Dr. Jeff Gardere, a clinical psychologist, said on "The Early Show" Tuesday, if you're in a "toxic" relationship that involves physical or mental abuse or in a relationship where you just can't get along, it's best to get out of it because the health benefits of divorce are much better than staying in a bad situation.

However, if you are thinking of getting a divorce, Gardere said you should have a doctor on hand.

Why?

"We're finding that divorce is so traumatic on the system, on your mind, on your body, that it's important that you consult your physician or even talk to a mental health professional about the stress that you're going through so that you don't become sick," he said.

The study also showed the benefits of being married versus unmarried, according to Gardere. Men seem to reap the benefits of being married much more than women in terms of emotional and physical health, while women do better financially because of marriage.

Gardere said that's because women tend to tell their husbands to take care of themselves on an ongoing basis, so they take the advice and care for their health.

"Early Show" co-anchor Julie Chen remarked men don't like to be nagged that way.

Gardere responded, "(Men) don't like to be nagged, but I think if you keep pushing them in the right direction, and tell them it is about love and about staying healthy, so that they can have a good marriage and raise their families, that guys after a while tend to listen."

But what about remarrying? Is it worth it?

Gardere says yes.

"We're finding that it is such a trauma to the system being in that divorce or being widowed that it does take years to come back even if you are married, but the advice we seem to be giving is go ahead and remarry because you can get better in time."

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Family Home in Divorce Part II

By Warren R. Shiell

The following information is specific to California.

What are the options for dividing the house?

There are three options if you are trying to reach a settlement:

(a) One spouse buys out the community interest share of the other spouse;
(b) The house is sold and the proceeds are divided; and
(c) The house remains in joint names for a limited period of time and is then sold to the other spouse or is put on the market.

During economic downturns when house prices are depressed couples increasingly turn to the last option.

But there is a catch. If you litigate, option (c) is called a deferred sale order (or a “Duke Order”) and the Court can only order a deferred sale in very limited circumstances where it is in lieu of child support and economically feasible. FN3.

Must the house be sold?

If the home is only asset of value in the marriage, the house may have to be sold unless one spouse is able to raise sufficient funds to buy out the other. Otherwise there are several ways to buy out a spouse’s interest in the family home.


1. One party may be able to buy the other out if they can re-finance and qualify for a new mortgage on their own using their own income. The selling spouse should never agree to remain on the mortgage.


2. If refinancing does not generate sufficient income, the selling spouse may be persuaded to accept an installment note secured by a deed of trust on the home. This is generally a bad idea. A spouse who cannot afford an immediate buy out upon divorce, in the long run is probably not going to pay all the costs associated with maintaining a home and pay back the installment loan.


3. Another option is buying out all or some of the community interest in the house with a release of spousal support. You will need to consult with an attorney and a tax specialist to determine the present and after tax value of the total support payments that are being exchanged.


4. It may also be possible to borrow from a retirement plan to finance the buy out. Again you should consult with a pension and tax specialist to discuss the costs of borrowing from your retirement plan. You may have to pay income taxes on the withdrawal and 10% early withdrawal penalties. You should also find out whether such a loan qualifies for mortgage interest deduction on your taxes. FN4


5. If there are other assets in the marriage, one spouse may elect to keep the house and the other may keep assets of equal value. For example, if the equity in the house is $200,000 and the value of pensions is $200,000 one spouse may keep the house and the other may keep the pensions. This is discussed in more detail below.

(read more on our website)

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Can registered domestic partners or same-sex spouses whose marriage is recognized under state law file federal tax returns using a married filing joi

According to an IRS publication: No. Registered domestic partners cannot file using a married filing separately or jointly filing status, because they are not spouses as defined by federal law. Likewise, same-sex partners who are married under state law may not file using a married filing separately or jointly filing status because federal law does not treat same-sex partners as spouses.

Family Home in Divorce Part I

By Warren R Shiell

The following information is specific to California.

In many divorces, the biggest financial question is who gets the family home. Should the wife get it, should the husband, or should they sell it and split the proceeds? And if they sell it how should the proceeds be divided.

Many times, the wife has an emotional tie to the home and she wants to keep it. This is where she raised their children and decorated and entertained. But she needs to consider whether she can afford to keep the home. If she keeps the house she is getting an illiquid asset that does not buy groceries for her children or create any income.

The first issue that must be considered is who owns the house. Is it entirely community property that should be split equally or does one spouse have a claim to a greater share.

Who owns the house?

Often the family home is the most important asset that a family owns. In a divorce the first question that a couple must consider is who owns the family home. Is it entirely community property that should be divided equally or does one spouse have a separate property interest that would result in an unequal division.

In California, there is a presumption that property acquired during the marriage is community property and each spouse is entitled to an equal share upon divorce. However, in the case of the family home this presumption may not apply if title is not in joint names. For example, if a house is purchased during the marriage but only one spouse’s name is on the title that spouse may be able to claim that the entire property is their separate property and that they do not have to share it with the other spouse. FN1. This can lead to very unfair results if the mortgage was paid during the marriage with community earnings or the downpayment was made with community savings. To avoid this result the disadvantaged spouse has to prove that there was a breach of a fiduciary duty and the Court should treat the house as community. If you are ever in this situation you need to immediately consult with an experienced family lawyer. Further, if your credit is bad and your spouse ever tries to convince you that the only way to get a mortgage is to put title in their name you should immediately consult with an attorney.

Another common situation is where one spouse owns a house prior to marriage. During the marriage the title remains in that spouse’s name but the outstanding mortgage is paid with community earnings. The spouse who is not on title may still have a community property interest by virtue of the mortgage payments made with community earnings. This is commonly referred to as a “Moore-Marsden” interest based on the two cases that establish the formula for calculating the community interest. FN2. When a couple have been married a long time and substantial amounts of community earnings have paid off an existing mortgage, making improvements or the parties have re-financed, this “Moore-Marsden” interest can be substantial.

You may wonder why this situation is so different to the one above where the home is acquired during the marriage in one spouse’s name. The simple answer is that’s what the Courts have decided. If you are ever in this situation you need to immediately consult with an experienced family lawyer.

(read more on our website)

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Domestic Partners Taxes

How do registered domestic partners determine their gross income for 2010?

Registered domestic partners must each report half the combined community income earned by the partners. In addition to half of the community income, a partner who has income that is not community income must report that separate income.

For more information see IRS http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=245869,00.html

Child Custody FAQs

1. What is "custody and visitation"?

2. What are the types of custody orders?

3. What are the types of visitation orders?

4. What is a "time-share plan" or a "parenting plan"?

5. What does the law consider when deciding custody and visitation?

6. What is "the best interest of the child"?

7. If we have joint legal custody, do we have to agree on everything?

8. If we have joint physical custody, do our children have to split their time equally between us?

9. Do grandparents have the right to visitation?

10. What is the process for getting a custody and visitation court order?

11. Can a custody and visitation order be changed?

(Read more on Child Custody)

© 2011 Warren R. Shiell. Warren R Shiell is a Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law attorney. All rights reserved. The information contained in this blog/website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.

For more information visit www.la-familylaw.com

Contact a Los Angeles Divorce Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.

Divorce and Money

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Ending the Alimony guessing game

Alexandra Harmin in a New York Times opinion considers whether its time to revise the alimony laws in New York State and achieve consistency with the use of a mathematical formula as they do with temporary support:


"According to the Internal Revenue Service, former spouses pay around $9 billion in alimony each year. The amounts and payment schedules are usually decided by family court judges using a list of factors, including the length of the marriage, the ages and health of the spouses, their financial situations, their earning potential and their contributions to the marriage, financial and otherwise.

These criteria are sensible enough. But judges are on their own in deciding how to prioritize the various factors and how to translate them into dollar amounts, resulting in wildly inconsistent alimony awards. When asked how much alimony a lifelong homemaker married to a doctor deserved, judges in an Ohio survey estimated as little as $5,000 a year and as much as $175,000."


Alimony in Massachusetts Gets Overhaul, With Limits

This from the New York Times (for full article) Gov. Deval Patrick on Monday signed into law new limits on alimony in Massachusetts, sharply curbing lifetime alimony payments in divorce cases and making a series of other changes to a system that critics considered outdated. Linda Lea Viken, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, said the law represented an about-face that could reverberate across the country. Most states, she said, do not have such specific guidelines for determining the length of alimony. “They’ve gone from the extreme of having it set in permanency to now being specific about when it terminates,” Ms. Viken said of Massachusetts. More details can be found from http://www.massalimonyreform.org/

Can a registered domestic partner itemize deductions if his or her partner claims a standard deduction?


According to a recent IRS publication:Can Yes. A registered domestic partner may itemize or claim the standard deduction regardless of whether his or her partner itemizes or claims the standard deduction. Although the law prohibits one spouse from itemizing deductions if the other spouse claims the standard deduction (section 63(c)(6)(A)), registered domestic partners are not spouses as defined by federal law and this provision does not apply to them.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

How should registered domestic partners report wages, other income items, and deductions on their federal income tax returns?



According to a recent IRS publication: Registered domestic partners should report wages, other income items, and deductions according to the instructions to Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, and related schedules. In addition, registered domestic partners should attach the Allocation Worksheet in Table 2 of Publication 555, Community Property, to their separate returns showing how the partners computed the income, deductions, and federal income tax withholding that each reported. Each partner should write the social security number of the other partner in the “Notes” section of the worksheet. If a registered domestic partner does not attach a worksheet, he or she must attach a copy of his or her partner's Form W-2 or 1099-R (in addition to his or her own) and make a notation on the form showing the division of income and tax withholding.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups

Questions and Answers for Registered Domestic Partners in Community Property States and Same-Sex Spouses in California

• IRS releases Questions and Answers for Same-Sex Spouses in California and Registered Domestic Partners in Community Property States: IRS Publication 555, Community Property, provides general information for taxpayers, including registered domestic partners and same-sex spouses, who reside in community property states. On September 16, 2011, the IRS released 19 Questions and Answers providing guidance for common issues.

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=245869,00.html

Monday, September 26, 2011

If a parent smokes marijuana will it affect custody?

The Courts used to take a much stricter no tolerance position on the use of custody. Nowadays, with the increasing use of medical marijuana, the Court's focus tends to be focused on the issue of whether a parents marijuana use affects parenting ability and judgment. In the case of Court of Appeals in the 2010 case of Marriage of Parr, 240 P.3d 509 (Colo.App.Div.1 2010) the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed a portion of the trial court's order upon a finding that the trial court could not require supervised parenting time for dad based solely on his marijuana use without a specific finding that dad's conduct endangered the child physically or impaired the child's emotional development as set forth in C.R.S. §14-10-129(1)(b)(I). The answer will therefore be on a case by case basis.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Can registered domestic partners or same-sex spouses whose marriage is recognized under state law file federal tax returns using a married filin

According to the IRS the answer is No. Registered domestic partners cannot file using a married filing separately or jointly filing status, because they are not spouses as defined by federal law. Likewise, same-sex partners who are married under state law may not file using a married filing separately or jointly filing status because federal law does not treat same-sex partners as spouses.

Really: Rumours that Sarah Palin's husband is considering divorce

Read this from the Telegraph in the UK:

Sarah Palin's husband 'files for divorce'
Sarah Palin with husband Todd, who is allegedly filing for divorce, according to new reports Photo: AFP/GETTY

Los Angeles Divorce Attorney

Los Angeles Family Law Attorney




UK Banks stop funding divorces

This article from the the UK that even in London – which has a reputation for being the world's 'divorce capital' – it has become very difficult to borrow to cover divorce costs, lawyers say.

Read more

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony are calling it quits

Pat Robertson Says Alzheimer's Makes Divorce OK

Read More

Source ABC News: Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson stunned "700 Club" viewers Tuesday when he said divorcing a spouse with Alzheimer's disease was justified. Robertson, chairman of the Christian Broadcasting Network and former Republican presidential candidate, said he wouldn't "put a guilt trip" on someone for divorcing a spouse with Alzheimer's disease, calling Alzheimer's itself "a kind of death."The remarks sparked outrage throughout religious and medical communities.

Craiglist: Man offers to pay for someone to marry ex-wife

This is an ad a man posted on Craiglist:

Nice well taken care of ex-wife. Mid 40's. Pretty and loyal. Never smoked and very little drinking. Will make someone a good companion (I know).... Will pay 10K to the man or woman who marries her in a way that stops me from having to pay her alimony.

Big thanks to Mississippi Family Law Blog.

Los Angeles Divorce


Wednesday, September 21, 2011

If my spouse purchases a house in his name during marriage because I have bad credit will it be his separate property?

Although there is a presumption that property acquired during marriage is community, there are now a number of cases that where one spouse takes title in his or her name it is to be treated as that spouses separate property. This most often comes about where one spouse has bad credit. The spouse who is not on title has a very difficult burden to prove that the property should be community because of a breach of a fiduciary duty e.g duress or they were tricked into signing. If you are in this situation you should consult with an experience family lawyer before signing any documents such as a Quitclaim deed giving your spouse sole title. There was a recent discussion of this in the unpublished opinion of the California Appeals Court in the Santana Case on August 25, 2011.

Developing a parenting plan

Developing a Parenting Plan

How can parents decide on a custody and visitation plan?
Parents who separate should have a custody and visitation or parenting plan for deciding how they will share parenting responsibilities. A custody and visitation plan must be in writing and signed by both parties and a judge to be enforceable.
What if parents cannot agree on a custody and visitation plan?
If parents cannot agree on custody and visitation on their own they may go to court and ask a judge for a temporary order. The Court will first send them to Conciliation Court where a trained mediator tries to help the parties agree. In Los Angeles conciliation services are free. An appointment can be made by calling conciliation services at (213) 974-5524.

If the parties still cannot agree, the Court will make a temporary custody and visitation order that is in the best interests of the children. The temporary order will continue until the parties can reach an agreement or until custody and visitation is resolved after a trial.

If parents cannot agree on custody and visitation, they can also ask the court to appoint a mental health expert such as a psychologist to carry out a custody evaluation. A list of custody evaluators can be found at the Los Angeles Court 's web site at www.lasuperiorcourt.org.

Developing a Plan
While it is difficult to make generalizations about the suitability of various parenting plans many experts agree that during the first years of life, it is important for young children to develop an attachment to a primary caretaker and recommend frequent but non-overnight visitation with the non-custodial parent for short periods of time. As the children grow older and are better able to develop multiple attachments longer periods of continuous overnight visitation is encouraged.

Consider the practical aspects of any plan

A first step in developing a plan is charting out the schedules of the children and both parents. This will help you make realistic choices based upon practical considerations. Take a calendar and chart out in a colored pen the activities of each of your children (e.g. when they leave and return from school/day care each day, when they go to different activities such as music lessons, when they have vacations etc.) Next, take a different colored pen and chart your activities and commitments. Include when you go to and return from work, go to meetings, go out with friends etc. With another colored pen do the same for the other parent. You should then compare both parents’ plans to see if there is any common ground.

The children’s best interests

When parents decide custody and visitation they should develop a plan around the needs and best interests of their children and not their needs. In other words, they should adjust the plan to the children, not the children to the plan. Parents should be looking at their children's need for love, emotional support and security. Parents should take into account their children's age, personality and experiences. Children will generally be better off when both parents are involved and participating in their upbringing.

Next you should consider who has historically been responsible for different commitments with the children and which parent is practically able to fulfill them in the future. Questions you should consider are:

Who do the children turn to when they have a problem or need to share their feelings?
Who does homework with the children?
What do the children do on the weekends?
Do the children spend time with relatives and who takes them?
Who takes the children to medical appointments or picks them up in when they are sick?
Who provides the children’s physical care, such as bathing, changing diapers, arranging for sitters, haircuts, feeding?
How do you and your spouse discipline the children and set structure for them?
What kind of personal attention do each of you give to the children, such as teaching problem solving, reading, playing together, sharing activities?
Who is responsible for the children’s social activities, such as arranging birthdays, play dates, trick or treating, taking class trips, games, lessons, school plays etc?


Joint Custody

For older children one of the key issues is whether a joint custody is more appropriate than an arrangement where the non-custodial parent has alternate weekends and one or two overnights during the week. The answer will be different for each family. The parent’s relationship and their level of cooperation and also the children’s preferences can be as important as how much time the children physically spend with each parent. The Family Code provides that any parental plan must encourage frequent and continuing contact although it does not specify a particular plan.

The Legal Aspects of a Plan

Any parenting plan will have to make provision for who gets "legal" custody and who gets "physical" custody of the children. These are the terms that are used in agreements.

"Legal" custody means which parent gets to make important decisions about the children's education, religious upbringing, medical treatment and other legal decisions. If one parent gets to make these decisions they have "sole legal custody." If both parents get to make those decisions together, they have "joint legal custody." It is rare for one parent to be granted sole legal custody unless there are issues of domestic violence and substance abuse or there is a history of the parents being unable to communicate. In deciding on issues relating to legal custody, form "Joint Legal Custody Attachment" FL-341 (E) which has been approved by the Judicial Council of California is helpful. It can be found at www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/.

"Physical" custody means who the children live with on a daily basis. A parent has "sole" physical custody if the primary residence of the child is with that parent. The non-custodial parent then has visitation rights. The parents have "joint" physical custody if the children live with each parent for significant periods of time during the week.

A custody and visitation plan should be consistent and detailed. It should spell out who gets the children when and where in enough detail so that it is easy to understand and enforce. Important questions are who has the children in the week and on the weekends? Who transports the children for exchanges and to activities? Who gets the children on holidays and vacations? In California, the Judicial Counsel has developed forms to be used when requesting custody and visitation. The forms "Child Custody and Visitation Attachment FL-311 and "Children's Holiday Schedule Attachment” can be found at www. Courtinfo.ca.gov/forms and are helpful in developing plans.


Sample physical custody plans

Some states have developed model parenting plans that take into account what is appropriate for children of different ages and stages of development. The Oregon Judicial Department and the Supreme Court for the State of Arizona have both developed model parenting plans for Parents that suggest different parenting plan options. (see Oregon ’s plan at http://www.ojd.state.or.us/osca/cpsd/courtimprovement/familylaw/parentingplan.htm.

Arizona ’s plan at www.supreme.state.az.us/dr/Text/ModelPTPlans.htm)

The following samples are based on those parenting plans.
Parent A’s time with the child is indicated by solids.
Birth to 12 months

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thur

Fri

Sat

Sun

8am

9am

10am

11am

Noon

1pm

2pm

3pm

4pm

5pm

6pm

7pm

8pm


Sample Language:

Commencing on _________, Parent A shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) each week on Tuesday and Thursday from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 pm. and Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Parent A shall be responsible for picking up and dropping of the minor child(ren) at the residence of Parent B. Parent B shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) at all other times not designated as Parent A’s time.

Comments:

At this young age, infants form a primary attachment to one parent and long periods of absence from the primary attachment figure may be traumatic. Parents should minimize the infant’s basic sleep, feeding and waking cycles.

Pre-schooler 3 – 5 years


Mon

Tue

Wed

Thur

Fri

Sat

Sun

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4


The parties alternate weekends and the non-custodial parent has one or more overnights during the week.

Sample Language:
A. Commencing on ___________, Parent A shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) alternate weekends from Friday, after the end of school/child care/camp (or at 5:30 p.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall pick up the child(ren) from school/child care/camps, or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care, until Monday, at the start of school/child care (or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall drop the minor child(ren) off at school/child care/camp or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp.

B. Commencing on ____________, Parent A shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) each week from Wednesday, after the end of school/child care camp (or at 5:30 p.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall pick up the child(ren) from school/child care/camp, or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp, until Thursday, at the start of school/child care/camp(or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall drop the minor child(ren) off at school/child care/camp or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp.

C. Parent B shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) at all other times not designated as Parent A’s time.
* Instead of referring to alternate weekends, a plan can refer to 1st, 3rd and 5th weekends of the month. This generally avoids any confusion about which parents has custody on any given weekend.

Comments:

This plan is sometimes referred to a “Freeman” order. It may be suitable where Parent B has not been very involved in the day to day care of the child and has a busy work schedule. Three to five year olds may show increased anxiety moving between parent’s homes. This does not necessarily reflect on whether the other parent is not a good parent or does not want to be with the other parent. Depending on the maturity of the child and the practicality of the exchanges these times can be negotiated so that Parent A only has the child one or two evenings in the week and has shorter or longer weekends.

“2:2:3” Joint Physical Custody for older children


Mon

Tue

Wed

Thur

Fri

Sat

Sun

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4


The parties alternate weekends and each parent has the children two days in the week.

Sample Language:
A. Commencing on __________, Parent A shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) each week from Monday, at the start of school/child care/camp (or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent B shall drop the minor child(ren) off at school/child care/camp, or at Parent A’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp, subject to paragraph C below, until Wednesday, at the start of school/child care/camp (or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall drop the minor child(ren) off at school/child care/camp or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp.

B. Commencing on __________, Parent B shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) each week from Wednesday, at the start of school/child care/camp (or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall drop the child(ren) off at school/child care/camp or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp, until Friday, at the start of school/child care/camp (or at 8:00 a.m. if the children are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent B shall drop the child(ren) off at school/child care/camp or at Parent A’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp, subject to paragraph C below.

C. The parties shall alternate physical custody of the minor child(ren) during the weekends, from Friday, at the start the start of school (or at 8:00 a.m. if the children are not in school), until their return to school on Monday (or at 8:00 a.m. if the children are not in school) when the children shall be returned to their respective school or to the receiving parent’s residence, in the event the children are not in school.

Comments:

The child spends no longer than three days/nights away from either parent.


“2:2:5:5” Joint Physical Custody For Older Children


Mon

Tue

Wed

Thur

Fri

Sat

Sun

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4


The parties alternate two and five day periods with the children. Each parent has two consecutive midweek overnights each week and alternate the weekends.

Sample Language:

A. In Week 1, commencing ________, Parent A shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) each week from Monday, at the start of school/child care/camp (or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent B shall drop the minor child(ren) off at school/child care/camp, or at Parent A’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp, until Wednesday, at the start of school/child care/camp (or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall drop the minor child(ren) off at school/child care/camp or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp.

B. In Week 1 and 2, commencing ________, Parent A shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) on Friday, after the end of school/child care/camp (or at 5:30 p.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall pick up the child(ren) from school/child care/camps, or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care, until the following Wednesday, at the start of school/child care (or at 8:00 a.m. if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp), when Parent A shall drop the minor child(ren) off at school/child care/camp or at Parent B’s residence if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp:

C. After the conclusion of Week 2, the two week rotation shall commence again with the physical custody schedule set forth above for Week 1.

B. Parent B shall have custody of the children at all times not designated as Parent A’s time.

Comments:
The works better for well adjusted children who have a good attachment to both parents. It allows for joint physical custody but each child is only away from the non-custodial parent for five days.

Alternating Weeks - Joint Physical Custody

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thur

Fri

Sat

Sun

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4


Sample Language:

Commencing __________, and on alternate weeks thereafter, Parent A shall have physical custody of the minor child(ren) from Monday at the start of school/child care/camp, or from 12:00 noon if the child(ren) are not in school/child care/camp, until Parent A returns the child(ren) to school the following Monday at the commencement of school, or 12:00 noon if the child(ren) is not in school/child care/camp, when Parent A shall return the child(ren) to Parent B’s residence. Parent B shall have custody of the child(ren) at all other times.

Comments:

The children may need to have mid-week contact with the non-custodial parent. This schedule can be altered to provide for a mid-week evening or overnight with the non-custodial parent.

Step up Plans

A frequently encountered problem is that a plan you develop now may not necessarily be appropriate in the future. For example, a plan for young children which permits the non-custodial parent limited overnights may not be appropriate when the children are older. A court may not be willing to change the status quo simply because the children have grown up and are better able to transition between households. One way of dealing with this is to create a “step-up plan” that provides increased periods of custody to the non-custodial parent when the children reach a certain age.

Step-up plans are particularly useful in reaching settlements where there are concerns about the parenting abilities of the non-custodial parent or the psychological harm that moving between two households will have on a child. Step up plans foster a sense of trust, responsibility and reliability as the non-custodial parent and the children familiarize themselves with the new routines and new households.

Step up plans are also useful to encourage parental responsibility where there are substance abuse problems or visitation has to be monitored because a parent has endangered the child. These step up plans should be drafted to allow the non-custodial parent increased time when they have met specific goals e.g. they have remained clean and sober for six months.

Holidays

It is common for parents to alternate holidays each year with one parent having a holiday in even years and the other having it in odd years. Many holidays are celebrated on a Monday and parents elect to extend the previous weekend. However, if you have a parenting plan which provides for switching custody on alternate weekends you will have to decide whether the weekend or the holiday schedule take precedence.

Typical holidays and special days include Mothers/Fathers day, Memorial Day, children’s birthdays, July 4th, Labor Day, Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve and Day, parent’s birthdays and family reunions. Jewish holidays may include Passover, Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur. In deciding on issues relating to holidays, form "Children’s Holiday Schedule" FL-341 (C) which has been approved by the Judicial Council of California is helpful. It can be found at www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/

During the winter vacation many parents elect to divide the winter vacation. Since the midway point may or may not include Christmas Eve and Christmas Day parents may also elect to split these days.

During the summer recess many parents provide that either parent may have the children for two or three continuous weeks provided that they give each other sufficient notice in advance of their plans. If their plans conflict one parent’s choice prevails in odd years and the other parent’s choice prevails in even years.

Sample Legal Custody Plans

In deciding on issues relating to legal custody, form "Joint Legal Custody Attachment" FL-341 (E) which has been approved by the Judicial Council of California is helpful. It can be found at www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/ Where both parents are cooperative and are able to communicate the following joint legal custody language can be used.

Sample Language:

The parties shall have joint legal custody of the child(ren). In exercising joint legal custody, the parties shall make every reasonable effort to foster feelings of affection between themselves and the child(ren). The parties shall cooperate and consult with one another so as to reach mutual agreement on all issues affecting the health, education and welfare of the children, including but not limited to the following:

(1) Enrollment or termination in a particular private or public school/child care/summer camp;

(2) Beginning or ending the regular practice of religion;

(3) Commencement of psychiatric, psychological or other mental health counseling or therapy;
(4) Authorizing the children’s drivers’ licenses;
(5) Passport applications;
(6) Enrollment in regular extracurricular activities;
(7) Non-emergency medical or dental treatment, other than routine check-ups.

How do we modify a parenting plan if circumstances change?

Once a parenting plan has been signed by a Court, the parties can change the plan by agreement which they then submit to the Court. If they cannot agree a party can request that the Court modify the plan. If the plan is part of a final custody determination that party must prove that a change is in the best interests of the children and they may also have to show that there has been a substantial change of circumstances if the plan gave one parent primary custody.

The other parent wants to move out of state. What can I do?

In recent years several Court decisions have set forth the following rules regarding move-aways. If there has been no court order, the Court looks to the best interests of the children.If there has been a Final Court order and one parent wants to modify that order by moving out of state the legal standard depends on whether the original Court order provides for joint custody. The Courts have not specifically defined what percentage of time-sharing qualifies as joint custody. One Court decided that a plan which gave a father alternate weekend visitation and an overnight every week amounting to 30% custody was not joint custody but “liberal visitation.”

If the parents have joint custody, the court looks afresh at the situation and decides what is in the best interests of the child. However, if one parent has primary physical custody (generally more than 60%) it is much harder for the non-custodial parent to prevent the move away. They must prove that the move is being made in bad faith or would be detrimental to the welfare of the child. Only then will the Court review the best interests of the child.

However, the law in this area is far from settled and if you are negotiating a parenting plan you should ask your attorney for advice about what will happen if one parent decides to move away.
Links
© 2006 Warren R. Shiell. All rights reserved. The information contained in this website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.